The imperative to transform the finance department to function in a more strategic, forward-looking and action-oriented fashion has been a consistent theme of practitioners, consultants and business journalists for two decades. In all that time, however, most finance and accounting departments have not changed much. In our benchmark research on the Office of Finance, nine out of 10 participants said that it’s important or very important for finance departments totake a strategic role in running their company. The research also shows a significant gap between this objective and how well most departments perform. A large majority (83%) said they perform the core finance functions of accounting, fiscal control, transaction management, financial reporting and internal auditing, but only 41 percent said they play an active role in their company’s management. Even fewer (25%) have implemented a high degree of automation in their core finance functions and actively promote process and analytical excellence.
Topics: Analytics, Big Data, Budgeting, Business Analytics, Business Collaboration, Business Performance Management (BPM), CEO, CFO, CIO, close, Cloud Computing, Continuous Accounting, Continuous Planning, CPQ, end-to-end, Financial Performance Management, Financial Performance Management (FPM), FPM, Governance, GRC, Human Capital, In-memory, Mobile Technology, Planning, Predictive Analytics, Risk, Social Media, Tax, Uncategorized, Office of Finance
Last year Ventana Research released our Office of Finance benchmark research. One of the objectives of the project was to assess organizations’ progress in achieving “finance transformation.” This term denotes shifting the focus of CFOs and finance departments from transaction processing toward more strategic, higher-value functions. In the research nine out of 10 participants said that it’s important or very important for the department to take a more strategic role. This objective is both longstanding and elusive. It has been part of the conversation in financial management circles since the 1990s and has been a primary focus of my research practice since its inception 12 years ago. Yet our recent research shows that most finance organizations struggle with the basics and few companies are even close to achieving this desired transformation.
Topics: Analytics, Big Data, Budgeting, Business Performance Management (BPM), CEO, CFO, CIO, close, CPQ, end-to-end, Financial Performance Management, Financial Performance Management (FPM), FPM, Governance, GRC, In-memory, Planning, Predictive Analytics, Risk, Tax, Tax-Datawarehouse, Office of Finance
PROS Holdings, a provider of price and revenue optimization software, has an agreement in principle to acquire Cameleon Software, which offers configure, price and quote (CPQ) applications. The combined company is likely to benefit from a broader geographic presence (PROS is based in Houston while Cameleon is in Toulouse, France) for their sales and marketing efforts. However, the longer-term strategic value of the merger lies in the combination of the related categories of price optimization and CPQ to improve sales effectiveness and financial performance.
Topics: Analytics, Business Analytics, Business Collaboration, Business Performance Management (BPM), CEO, CFO, CPQ, Financial Performance Management (FPM), FP&A, FPM, Operational Performance Management (OPM), Price Optimization, PRO, Profitability, PROS, Sales, Sales Performance Management (SPM)