You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Risk’ tag.
All the hubbub around big data and analytics has many senior finance executives wondering what the big deal is and what they should do about it. It can be especially confusing because much of what’s covered and discussed on this topic is geared toward technologists and others working outside of Finance, in areas such as sales, marketing and risk management. But finance executives need to position their organization to harness this technology to support the strategic goals of their company. To do so, they must have clarity as to what big data can do, what they want it to do, and what skills and tools they need to meet their objectives.
Big data has always been with us, just on smaller scales: The term refers to data sets so large and complex that organizations have difficulty processing them using on-hand database management systems and applications. It has become a popular buzzword because technology for handling big data has crossed a threshold, making it at the same time more capable and cost-effective. Companies now can tap into huge amounts of structured and unstructured data using advanced data processing technologies, analytics and visualization tools to achieve insights not previously available using more conventional techniques. In a recent research analysis, I covered some of the potential benefits (and potential pitfalls) of big data as it relates to company management. Increasingly, the ability to analyze large quantities of business-related data rapidly holds the promise of fundamental changes in how executives and managers run their businesses. Properly deployed, big data analytics enables a more forward-looking and agile management style, even in very large enterprises. Because it allows more flexible forms of business organization, it can give finance organizations greater scope to play a more strategic role in corporate management.
Big data and analytics are a natural combination. By itself, a mass of data is not especially useful, and there are significant challenges to teasing out insight from such large data sets. However, information technology has evolved to make assembling and working with extremely large amounts of data far more practical. As well, routines involving advanced analytics that were once the domain of people with Ph.D.s in statistics are increasingly usable by business analysts, as new analytical software packages are designed to hide the complexity of the underlying statistical work. My colleague Tony Cosentino recently summarized the progress to date in adoption of big data analytics, covering some of the existing uses (already numerous) and emerging trends.
Keep in mind that it’s not just a matter of learning how to master new software and munge data. Finance departments must sharpen their skills in determining how to best utilize big data analytics. And it’s even more important that finance executives understand how to make practical use of big data analytics: In some cases users may want to consume only the output of the analytics created by other parts of the organization (such as demand forecasts by product families), while in others the organization may want to purchase applications that use or embed big data analytics (such as continuous monitoring for ERP systems governance) or enable price and profit optimization.
Our benchmark research on operational intelligence, a technology-driven discipline that has been using big data operating across networks and systems has been using analytics for years, shows that the most common reasons for using such applications (cited by almost three in five companies) are to manage performance, detect fraud, comply with regulations and manage risk. These areas are broadly applicable for finance organizations, but I assert that as well as governance and control, initially the three main applications of big data analytics are planning, reviews and alerts. Here’s how.
Companies do a lot of planning, so it’s useful to segment the activity. One way is by time. There are three main planning time frames in which big data analytics plays a role.
- Short-term tactical planning is used, for example, to project demand for specific products or create offers that might spur incremental demand. Especially in consumer products and business-to-consumer marketing, these models are statistically and computationally challenging, as they must be continually updated and adjusted. However, this is not an area of business where Finance has taken a role.
- Long-term and strategic planning can help determine the impact of a confluence of factors on markets and costs. Decades ago, the largest companies maintained strategic planning staffs to generate long-term forecasts to inform senior executives of important market trends. Except at companies that have very long cycles with specific demand and supply requirements, those staffs have disappeared or have been substantially reduced as corporations switched to third-party sources.
- In the time horizon between short- and long-term planning there are techniques for improving the accuracy of forecasts of revenue and costs using large sets of historical data, which enable organizations to better understand the various factors that influence demand. This sort of advanced modeling using predictive analytics can be useful in improving the accuracy of corporate business planning and budgeting, which is at the core of financial planning and analysis. Predictive analytics uses techniques from statistics, modeling and data mining that weigh multiple current and historical facts and their interactions to predict outcomes. Good predictive models can identify the most important factors driving outcomes, and because of this, they often can be more accurate than simple extrapolation. For example, by examining large sets of historical data, a fast-food chain can predict with reasonable accuracy demand for certain menu items at specific locations at a given hour of a given day by taking into account factors such as the day of the week, time of the year, sales patterns over the past three weeks, advertising spend and special offers.
As useful as predictive analytics are for forecasting, they may be even more valuable when applied to reviews and alerts. Predictive analytics can provide a baseline against which to compare actuals. This, in turn, enables an organization to get an earlier warning when results diverge meaningfully from what was expected, so executives and managers can react immediately rather than in days or weeks. For example, in business-to-business relationships that involve many routine purchases (any sort of supplies, for example) a divergence from established trends could generate an alert to the sales organization. Embedded analytics in an order-entry system could highlight late or smaller-than-usual orders. These might indicate a competitive threat or some other issue that would benefit from a timely interaction with the customer. This is just one of the ways that data captured by the financial systems can be used to improve the effectiveness of other business units, enabling the department to play a more strategic role in supporting the company.
Another use is in accounts receivable, where predictive analytics can promote customer satisfaction. To illustrate, a company that does a routine analysis of payment patterns can have a good idea of when specific customers will pay. If one that routinely pays its invoice between the 16th and 19th day of the month has not paid by the 23rd day, the analytics system generates an alert. A call to the customer or an automated email notes the delayed payment, asking if there was an error in the billing or some other point in dispute. There are a couple of advantages to this approach. If nothing else, if there is an issue, it is likely to be resolved more quickly. Moreover, from a customer satisfaction perspective, it’s a far superior form of customer interaction than waiting several weeks and then sending out a dunning notice demanding payment. Resolving any issue sooner improves cash flow, and if the company did make a mistake, asking for payment will only annoy the customer. Another use of big data in receivables is to automatically identify customers that are routinely tardy in paying. This can kick off an internal company discussion about what ought to be done about the situation, such as limiting credit or finding ways to accelerate payments.
Governance is another area where big data analytics are already at work, with companies using it for fraud detection and alerting. For instance, software packages can monitor a company’s financial systems for evidence of suspicious activities such as payments to bogus vendors or top-level alterations to financial statements. Such systems are designed to be high-level controls that reduce the need for manual internal and external audit work. And even more is possible. As I noted earlier, in the not-too-distant future it may be possible to have an “auditor in a box” – a forensic system that continuously identifies and lists all suspicious activities, transactions and conditions and weighs their materiality. Such a system would permit more timely responses to the risk of material errors or fraud and facilitate examinations by external auditors. In addition to being far more efficient than periodic manual effort, the auditor-in-a-box concept is potentially more reliable because it examines everything rather than relying on sampling.
However, there are challenges. Staffing and training are significant issues for Finance in dealing with big data analytics. Our research into the challenges of utilizing big data shows that nearly four in five companies find staffing and training to be an obstacle in utilizing big data. Despite the fact that analytics is an inherent element of the finance function, it almost always involves the broad application of basic approaches employing simple math (ratio and margin analysis, for example). Few departments have applied advanced analytics: Our finance analytics research finds that only 13 percent of finance departments employ predictive analytics.
To be able to handle these staffing and training needs, finance executives must understand their department’s big data analytics competence requirements. A useful place to start is to become familiar with the five personas Tony Cosentino developed to describe the people working with business intelligence and analytics. These personas illustrate the various objectives, skills and interests that individuals bring to the discipline. Adapting his approach to big data analytics to this discussion, at the top of the list are highly skilled statisticians who do exploratory work and create purpose-built analytics and analytical models to address specific tasks. These people usually have advanced degrees in statistics and understand how to use sophisticated analytical software and data sets to their fullest. Few finance organizations need this level of capability. A second type of user includes business analysts who have in-depth knowledge of the business and finance issues, know how to access and apply available data relevant to the issue, and have the ability and commitment to master software that requires training but not an advanced degree in statistics. Depending on a company’s size, finance organizations will need a person or a group of people with this level of competence. A third type is the knowledge worker. This description includes executives, managers and directors who need to interact with – not just consume – advanced analytics. These types of users should not be expected to learn how to create or structure analytics, but they need to know how to employ analytics embedded in dashboards or applications as well as visual discovery tools, which are increasingly user-friendly. This level is where the need is broadest, so finance executives must focus most of their efforts in terms of developing these skills.
Big data analytics is an important development that will challenge finance organizations to use new capabilities to improve their effectiveness and enhance their company’s competitiveness. There are many ways organizations can begin to address the challenge. At least, CFOs and senior finance executives should create a steering committee to identify opportunities to apply big data analytics; identify gaps in skills, processes, data availability and software; and establish timelines and goals. Moreover, if CFOs are serious about exploiting the potential of big data analytics, they must communicate its importance to their department and demonstrate a commitment to a plan of action.
Robert Kugel – SVP Research
Informatica and Exterro have announced a partnership in the market for discovery of electronic data and documents (known as e-discovery). Exterro has made its reputation in e-discovery workflow and legal holds management while Informatica is a leader in data integration that our Value Index finds as the top and Hot rated provider. The partnership is designed to provide users of Exterro’s Fusion E-Discovery software with a single point of control for organizing and managing legal and preservation holds (that is, preventing electronic data from alteration or deletion) of unstructured and structured data that are held in Informatica’s Data Archive. Informatica specializes in the efficient management of information assets, which our benchmark research shows is not easy for most organizations to do because they have data spread across multiple applications and systems: Two-thirds of organizations said that this makes it difficult to manage information. By consolidating in a single repository the storage of information that is likely to be the subject of discovery, companies can simplify and cut the cost of the search process as well as reduce risk. Orchestrating legal and preservation holds can be complex since multiple people or groups within a company may be legally involved with the same data over an extended period of time. Moreover, it’s important to ensure that once the holds are no longer needed, all data that can be eliminated is eliminated.
This situation brings to light an increasingly sensitive predicament for many businesses. Corporations are required by law to retain records for a given period. These times differ from one jurisdiction to the next and vary according to the type of information in the records. For example, retention periods for general business matters tends to be the shortest, while information related to pharmaceuticals and radioactive materials require long retention. Traceability – the ability to determine and verify the history, use or location of an item and its constituent parts across an entire supply chain – is a fixture in some in some businesses such as those providing critical materials used in aerospace parts and to an increasing extent food. Failure to preserve data or to be able to produce it a timely fashion can lead to heavy fines or expensive judgments. The flip side to retention is that corporations must take care to delete records that no longer have business value and are not required to be retained, since even innocent items can pose a needless threat in litigation and add to the cost of maintaining and finding information.
Once mainly an issue in the United States, the increasing volume of litigation worldwide and ever expanding regulation of businesses has expanded the breadth and amount of information that parties may have to produce in the discovery phase of litigation and regulatory actions. Along with this trend, e-discovery has grown exponentially in importance as more and more of everyday business is captured in electronic systems. Hence the need for software to manage the e-discovery process and the underlying data.
A great deal of the information needed for e-discovery is unstructured – documents and email are particularly common. But especially in financial services, information contained in structured databases also is important. Banks, brokers/dealers and insurance companies all generate a considerable amount of structured data related to operations that can be subject to discovery. The volumes of data that are exposed to discovery continue to grow in lockstep with the growth of data created by today’s IT systems.
Law and regulation by the book prescribe processes that must be managed and documented carefully. Workflows handle processes affect the efficiency with which discovery management is executed. Legal holds require tagging of documents that have to be available in the discovery process to ensure that they are not inadvertently removed or deleted from a repository. For example, if a set of transactions and related email messages are germane to a regulatory action, they must be preserved until the issue is resolved, regardless of whether under ordinary circumstances they would be destroyed because their legally defined retention period had expired.
Exterro’s Fusion E-Discovery Suite incorporates the necessary capabilities as well as data mapping and data management to make processing records efficient. Exterro competes with IBM and Hewlett Packard/Autonomy, among others, in the e-discovery market. It positions itself as providing a more open portal than the others, enabling customers to have greater freedom to decide where the data is held. The company will benefit from the new partnership by having tight integration with a key information storage provider. Informatica for its part has acquired another important use case that provides durable value to its existing and prospective customers.
Companies – especially their legal departments – often fail to recognize the negative impact that poor data management has on their ability to execute consistently and efficiently. Usually, they recognize they have a problem only after an expensive or embarrassing failure. It’s important that organizations regularly review their data assets and data management practices to determine where they can be a source of failure or inefficiency and address these issues immediately. They should consider how Exterro and Informatica can help them reduce a potentially dangerous risk exposure that our research confirms that over half (51%) of organizations indicate as their top ranked concern in governance, risk and compliance.
Robert Kugel – SVP Research