You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘multinational’ tag.

Longview Solutions has a longstanding presence in the financial performance management (FPM) software market and was rated a VI_FPM_Hot_VendorHot vendor in our most recent FPM Value Index. Several years ago it began offering a tax provision and planning application. I think it’s worthwhile to focus on the tax category because it’s less well known than others in finance and is an engine of growth for Longview. We expect larger corporations increasingly to adopt software to manage direct (income) taxes to improve the quality and efficiency of what today in most companies is an inefficient, spreadsheet-driven process.

Longview’s tax offering consists of four main components. Its Tax Data Platform can be the central repository of a corporation’s tax information. I’ve commented on the need to maintain tax data separate from the data that’s used for financial reporting, managerial accounting and performance management. One reason is that tax accounting must be aligned with legal entities, not corporate organizational structures, because direct taxes are levied on legal entities, not corporate divisions or reporting hierarchies. A second is that tax data must be held in an “as was” state, without regard to subsequent corporate actions such as acquisitions and divestitures or management reorganizations. Longview’s Tax Data Collection software consolidates book and tax data from disparate source systems; it is designed to automate and streamline the movement of data and eliminate time-consuming manual work. It can do consolidations in different, parallel paths if dissimilar methods of consolidating tax-related data are required by the statutes of individual taxing authorities. The Tax Provision/Reporting component performs global tax accounting and reporting. And Tax Planning supports a company’s analysis and planning of its taxes.

Software vendors are taking two different approaches to dedicated tax management software. One mostly focuses on the needs of the finance department: It automates and simplifies incorporation of already calculated tax data into the financial consolidation and close process. This is useful for companies that operate in up to a handful of tax jurisdictions and have relatively simple legal entity structures. The other approach addresses the needs of the tax department as well as the rest of the finance organization. Longview’s tax offering falls into the latter category because it provides the functionality and data-handling capabilities that tax departments need to streamline their operations, enhance their ability to manage tax expenses and improve senior executives’ understanding of tax exposures and strategies to deal with them.

Longview’s tax software can replace desktop spreadsheets, which are the most common tool used for direct tax provisioning and planning in companies of all sizes. Spreadsheets are the wrong choice for managing taxes because they are so time-consuming. Tax vr_fcc_tax_insightdepartments use them to make often complex tax calculations, manage tax data and direct tax processes – these are tasks that dedicated software can handle easily but spreadsheets cannot. They are not well equipped to do these tasks quickly and accurately on a consistent basis. Consequently, facing looming deadlines, tax departments have little if any time left over to analyze and plan tax exposure and tax expense options more broadly and more intelligently. Spreadsheets also do not provide sufficient transparency or forward visibility in a timely fashion in the way that a dedicated system can. Spreadsheets make it difficult for companies to manage their tax risk exposure in a consistent fashion across all business units. They do not give executives sufficient insight into their risk exposure options. Our research on the financial close finds that a majority (53%) of finance executives believe that having better understanding of and deeper insight into their company’s tax positions would enable them to reduce their tax expense.

There are several other reasons why desktop spreadsheets are the wrong choice for handling taxes strategically. One is that tax laws and regulations are so fiendishly complex. For example, some countries have industry-specific statutory reporting requirements (for example, for insurance companies and other financial services). Tax calculations for subsidiaries in one country may not apply to those required for a regional headquarters or the parent company. There may be multiple tax rates applicable to a given legal entity and multiple bases or methods on which to apply each tax rate. Moreover, because book accounting for taxes and actual tax calculations almost always differ in multiple ways, it’s necessary to record and track these differences. Since rules, rates and assumptions will vary from year to year, it becomes necessary to adjust these differences. Desktop spreadsheets lack the dimensionality, data integrity and referential integrity necessary to be able to manage this level of detail easily. Dedicated tax management systems are designed to do it.

One reason why tax departments lag in adopting new tools is that until recently the technology necessary for managing the full range of requirements in direct tax analysis, provisioning and compliance was not mature enough for the organizations that needed it the most. Until recently, corporations that operate in multiple, worldwide jurisdictions with even modestly complex legal entity structures overtaxed the ability of IT systems to support them. However, using dedicated software for direct tax management enhances the efficiency of the tax department, enabling it to become more strategic and contribute to improving the company’s results.

Adopting a more strategic approach to managing direct taxes is an emerging trend in finance organizations, but it’s still at an early stage. Tax compliance is usually the main (and overwhelming) focus of tax departments. Most do this essential work reasonably well, but compliance is a tactical issue. To elevate tax management to a strategic level, tax and finance executives must have greater visibility into tax data and how operational decisions affect tax exposures. For example, finance and tax executives may construct a tax-optimized approach to transfer pricing, but their strategy may not be implemented if the company’s incentive compensation system is not aligned to this strategy. Operating managers in high-tax jurisdictions will try to maximize revenues because that’s what they’re rewarded for, even if it results in higher taxes than are necessary. Using spreadsheets is a significant barrier to tax departments taking a more strategic role in their company. When direct taxes are managed using desktop spreadsheets, there rarely is time for organizations to do much more than basic compliance. There’s usually not time to discover the fundamental disconnects between tax strategy and reality or other, similarly strategic activities such as analyzing and assessing the tax implications of long-term corporate plans.

vr_fcc_tax_effectivenessIndeed, one sign of the tax function’s lack of strategic impact is its invisibility. There is a general lack of understanding of how the tax department functions, even within the finance department. For example, our research discovered that nearly two-thirds of finance executives (and, specifically, 60% of CFOs and controllers) do not know how long it takes their tax department to calculate tax liabilities.

Another reason is the relatively low status of tax departments in their company, which we can gauge through the distribution of titles and relatively low compensation for the highly credentialed individuals in these departments. Those that work in tax also tend to be tight-lipped and reluctant to reveal that their processes are time-consuming and difficult to manage, lest they be viewed as less than competent. The tax department’s invisibility contributes to a lack of focus on direct taxation by senior management, which also diminishes an understanding at that level of the potential benefits of investing in technology. Companies that are most likely to want to improve how they manage their direct taxes appear to be the ones where a senior finance department executive has spent time in tax and therefore has a firsthand appreciation for the challenges.

I’ve commented on the need to make tax more strategic. An increasing number of companies are finding that investing in dedicated software to improve the performance of their tax department is worthwhile. It gives them a deeper understanding of how best to manage what is usually one of their biggest expenses and enables them to make more optimal decisions about taxes. I recommend that all larger companies look into the benefits they can achieve by making their tax department more strategic and that they investigate dedicated software such as Longview’s that can enable them to have such a strategic tax function.

Regards,

Robert Kugel – SVP Research

Technology for the Office of Finance can have transformative power. Although progress has been slow at times, today’s finance organizations are fundamentally different from those of 50 years ago. For one thing, they require far fewer resources (chiefly people) to perform basic accounting, treasury and corporate finance tasks. In addition, public corporations report results sooner – sometimes weeks sooner – than they could in the mid-20th century. And finance departments are able to harness substantially more data and a wider array of analytics to promote insight and support more agile decision-making.

Even in this context, in many corporations the tax function remains a backwater in its use of technology. Most of their tax professionals are awash in desktop spreadsheets, tools that they initially thought would promote efficiency and accuracy. But the inherent problems with desktop spreadsheets make tax processes not only needlessly time-consuming (even using macros and other spreadsheet automation techniques) but also prone to errors and inconsistencies. This is especially true if people must enter the same information multiple times, which increases the chances of mistakes. In addition, assumptions made and rationales behind formulas used in data transformations may not be documented or readily accessible to others in the organization. This legacy can be problematic years later in an audit, especially if the individual who prepared the spreadsheet is no longer employed at the company. And with spreadsheet-driven processes, auditing taxes and the underlying data and calculations is difficult and time-consuming. On top of all this, the effects of the desktop spreadsheet’s inherent shortcomings multiply with the size of a corporation. By their nature, these spreadsheets hinder a corporation’s ability to understand tax issues and optimize  related decisions.

Organizations do not have to put up with these outdated, counterproductive practices. New tools can help streamline tax processes. One is Vertex Enterprise (which I reviewed earlier this year). VR_tech_award_winner_2013Vertex recently was awarded Ventana Research’s 2013 Innovation Award for the Office of Finance for this suite of application and integrated use of tax data and analytics. Vertex offers a single-platform approach to managing all types of taxes (direct and indirect) across the entire tax life cycle, from analysis through provisioning to audit defense, using a single data source. Direct (income) tax management is still a largely manual process involving a plethora of desktop spreadsheets. Calculating and accounting for direct taxes is complicated, largely because income tax laws can be quite convoluted, especially in certain industries. As well, the larger the number of tax jurisdictions it operates in and the more numerous its subsidiary legal entities, the more complex tax management becomes.

Vertex Enterprise includes tax provisioning software for both indirect and direct taxes. Indirect Tax is managed by the company’s O Series software, a single platform that handles sales-and-use-, VAT- and goods and services taxes on a global scale. Direct taxes is handled by Vertex Tax Accounting, global tax provisioning and reporting software that works with multiple general ledger systems in  multiple currencies and across multiple years within the context of multiple accounting regimes such as US- and other national generally accepted accounting standards (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The web-based software supports a distributed, collaborative, enterprise-wide tax decision cycle process that can achieve more optimal tax-related decision making. Direct taxes exist in a parallel universe, and one advantage in having a single system is that it facilitates the process of reconciling the business accounting performed in ERP systems with the tax accounting governed by law. Vertex automates tax account reconciliation and reporting and manages adjustments that span multiple time periods.

One notable advance for corporate tax departments offered by Vertex Enterprise is its tax data warehouse (TDW). Because a TDW can automate much of the painstaking work that occupies much of the tax practitioner’s time, it can free these trained individuals to focus on making the best tax decisions possible. Also, because a TDW can increase visibility into tax analyses and calculations, corporations can be more confident in their tax-related decisions. And with this greater visibility and confidence, tax departments can become a mainstream participant in the finance function. This is especially important in an era of increasing cooperation between tax authorities worldwide. More than ever, corporations that operate globally must be able to optimize their tax positions over time and across multiple jurisdictions. A TDW enhances that capability.

Conceptually, a TDW is simple: It’s a data store that makes all tax data readily available and can be used to plan and provision a company’s taxes. However, in larger companies (those with more than 1,000 employees) that operate in multiple tax jurisdictions and have even moderately complex legal entity structures, tax-related data structures and calculations become fiendishly complex, as I noted in an earlier perspective. For that reason, the first attempts to create TDWs proved unworkable because the sheer complexity of the direct (that is, income) tax domain overwhelmed the available information technology. These limitations forced companies to take shortcuts, which meant that each TDW had to be a largely custom effort and therefore expensive to build. And because these shortcuts rendered the systems brittle and difficult to change, they were expensive to maintain. Today, however, technology is available to make TDWs practical.

A TDW has several purposes: to ensure accuracy and consistency in tax analysis and calculations, improve visibility into tax provisioning, vr_Fast_Close_2012_ERP_01_multiple_erp_systems_are_commonand cut the time and effort required to execute tax processes. The technology is especially useful because data management is one of the biggest operational challenges facing tax departments today. That is, the information necessary for tax provisioning, planning, compliance and audit may not be readily available to the tax department because accounting and other information is kept in multiple systems from multiple vendors. Our benchmark research shows that 90 percent of companies with 1,000 or more employees use financial systems from multiple vendors, and 43 percent use four or more. In addition, not all of the data necessary for tax department purposes is captured by the ERP system. As well, data collected in a general finance department warehouse or pulled together in a financial consolidation system may not be sufficiently granular for tax department purposes.

Moreover, most companies’ ERP systems (the core technology for gathering transaction data) are not inherently “tax aware,” so tax departments repeatedly need to perform transformational steps to ensure that data is formatted and organized properly. Sometimes the data must undergo multiple transformations because, for example, the transaction information collected in an overseas subsidiary must be reported locally using the local currency and accounting standard but translated to the parent company’s tax books in a different currency using a different accounting standard. In some industries (such as financial services) there may be multiple local reporting standards, one for general statutory purposes and another reflecting specific rules for that industry demanded by some regulatory authority. In short, there are numerous data-driven headaches tax professionals have to address before they even get down to work. A TDW addresses this problem.

Ventana Research is dedicated to helping organizations enhance the effectiveness and strategic value of the Office of Finance. Tax departments, CFOs and controllers in larger, more complex corporations should examine how the tax organization spends its time and determine to what degree more enterprise automation and fewer desktop spreadsheets would enable the company to understand and manage its tax needs more intelligently. Vertex Enterprise can be a useful foundation for transforming the tax function, which is why it received our Technology Innovation Award for Office of Finance for 2013.

Regards,

Robert Kugel – SVP Research

Twitter Updates

Stats

  • 78,969 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 70 other followers

%d bloggers like this: